升级至高级会员解锁所有内容!

移步至“会员中心”,完善资料并上传医师执照,即可升级至高级会员权限,浏览本站所有内容,包括使用培训软件、参与大赛和培训报名等。

去上传

跟激光内镜相比,使用LED内镜LCI和BLI进行肿瘤特征描述和检测的有效性

收藏已收藏
1760
LCI文献

跟激光内镜相比,使用LED内镜LCI和BLI进行肿瘤特征描述和检测的有效性

2022/06/06LCI文献
收藏已收藏
1760
查看全文

跟激光内镜相比,使用LED内镜LCI和BLI进行肿瘤特征描述和检测的有效性

The efficacy of tumor characterization and tumor detectability of linked color imaging and blue laser imaging with an LED endoscope compared to a LASER endoscope



N Yoshida, O Dohi, K Inoue, S Sugino… - International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2020 


结 论

近焦观察的LED内镜由于高亮度改善了肿瘤检测和特征描述。


Conclusions: A LED endoscope with close-distance observation improved tumor detection and characterization due to high brightness.

01

目的

已经上市的LED光源内镜有2毫米近焦观察功能,无需放大镜,LCI和BLI功能可用于肿瘤检测和特征描述。我们分析LED内镜相比激光内镜的效用。


Objectives: An endoscope with a light-emitting diode (LED) light source which has a 2-mm close-distance observation function without magnification, has been marketed, enabling linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI) for tumor detection and characterization. We analyzed the efficacy of a LED endoscope compared to a LASER endoscope. 

02

方法

我们回顾性回顾了2018年5月至2019年9月期间使用LED内镜系统(富士胶片公司)观察到的272个病灶。日本NBI分型适用于肿瘤特征描述。我们分析了诊断准确性和置信水平。我们还分析了用LED和激光内镜观察到的61个病灶,以比较诊断准确性。对于肿瘤的可检测性,我们计算了每个肿瘤在两种内镜系统的白光、BLI和LCI图像的色差值(CDVs)和亮度值(BVs)。


Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 272 lesions observed using the LED endoscopic system (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan) from May 2018 to September 2019. The Japanese NBI Classification was used for tumor characterization. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy and confidence level. Sixty-one lesions observed with both the LED and magnified LASER endoscopes were also analyzed to compare the diagnostic accuracy. Regarding the tumor detectability, we calculated color difference values (CDVs) and brightness values (BVs) of white-light imaging, BLI, and LCI modes between the two endoscopes for each tumor. 

03

结果

平均息肉大小为9.2 ± 11.3 mm。组织学特征显示71个无蒂锯齿状病变,193个腺瘤和高度不典型增生,以及8个T1期癌。≥ 10 和 < 10 mm肿瘤的诊断准确率分别为72.0%和92.9%(p < 0.001),高置信度为93.8%。LED的诊断准确率(77%)略高于没有带放大功能的激光(65.6%, p = 0.16),但不逊于带放大功能的激光(82.0%, p = 0.50)。LED和激光内镜的LCI(p = 0.30)的CDVs分别为20.6 ± 11.2 和21.6 ± 11.2(p < 0.001)。


Results: The mean polyp size was 9.2 ± 11.3 mm. Histology showed 71 sessile serrated lesions, 193 adenoma and high-grade dysplasias, and 8 T1 cancers. The diagnostic accuracy of tumors ≥ 10 and < 10 mm was 72.0% and 92.9% (p < 0.001), respectively and the high confidence rate was 93.8%. The diagnostic accuracy of LED (77.0%) was a little higher than that of LASER without magnification (65.6%, p = 0.16) but was not inferior to that of LASER with magnification (82.0%, p = 0.50). The respective CDVs of LED and LASER endoscopes were 20.6 ± 11.2 and 21.6 ± 11.2 for LCI (p = 0.30), and the respective BVs were 210.0 ± 24.2 and 175.9 ± 21.1 (p < 0.001).


点击查看原文

声明

富士胶片内镜世界(LIFE World)所登载的内容及其版权和使用权归作者本人与富士胶片所有。如发现会员擅自复制、更改、公开发表或其他以盈利为目的的使用,富士胶片将追究其法律责任。网站信息中涉及的治疗手技皆为术者个人针对该名患者特定体质及健康状况所采取的手法;术者对器械和药品种类的选择,也受到手术发生时间、地点等诸多因素的影响。因而相关内容及信息仅供会员参考。如盲目使用网站信息中涉及的治疗手技而发生意外,恕富士胶片及本网站对此不承担任何责任。

最新留言